The World's Largest Public Domain Media Search Engine
Results of medical experiments at Ravensbrueck

Similar

Results of medical experiments at Ravensbrueck

description

Summary

In the experiment, a mixture of phosphorus and rubber was applied to the skin and ignited. After twenty seconds, the fire was extinguished with water and then wiped with R17. After three days, the burn was treated with Echinacin in liquid form. After two weeks the wound had healed. This photograph, taken by a camp physician, was entered as evidence during the Doctors Trial at Nuremberg.

The Nuremberg Trials, also known as the Nuremberg process, were a series of trials held in Nuremberg, Germany, from 1945 to 1946, in which leaders of Nazi Germany were prosecuted for war crimes, crimes against peace, and crimes against humanity. The Nuremberg process was initiated by the Allied powers after the end of World War II, with the goal of bringing the major perpetrators of the war to justice. The trials were conducted by the International Military Tribunal (IMT), which was composed of judges from the United States, Great Britain, France, and the Soviet Union. The International Military Tribunal (IMT), composed of judges from the United States, Great Britain, France, and the Soviet Union, was established to try the major war criminals, including top Nazi officials such as Hermann Goering, Rudolf Hess, and Joachim von Ribbentrop. The IMT also established a framework for subsequent trials of lower-ranking Nazis and collaborators. The defendants were charged with crimes such as waging aggressive war, crimes against peace, and crimes against humanity, including genocide and war crimes. The Nuremberg process was significant because it established the principle that individuals, including heads of state, could be held accountable for their actions, even during times of war. It also introduced the concept of crimes against humanity, which refers to acts committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population. The Nuremberg process was not without controversy, with some critics arguing that the trials were biased and that the defendants were denied a fair trial and that it was victor's justice, and that the Allied powers were punishing only the defeated Axis powers while ignoring their own war crimes. However, the trials are generally seen as a landmark in the development of international law and the fight against impunity for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

date_range

Date

2016
create

Source

Wikimedia Commons
copyright

Copyright info

public domain

Explore more

maint deprecated template usage
maint deprecated template usage